Bitcoin Price Chart (BTC) Coinbase

Neo

Neo is an open-source, community driven platform that is leveraging the intrinsic advantages of blockchain technology to realize the optimized digital world of the future.
[link]

ROI is Return On Investment

After buying, selling, mining and staking more than three dozen altcoins it became clear that many coins had some great features but no single coin had everything. ROI Coin is essentially a coin that combines all the very best features of many great coins into one single coin. While most cryptocurrencies focus on and revolve around the coin itself ROI Coin is different. The focus of ROI Coin is the community and the coin revolves around the people that support it.
[link]

Kazakhstan Sets Eyes on Top-3 Spot for Global Bitcoin Mining (current BTC/USD price is $9,190.00)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Kazakhstan Sets Eyes on Top-3 Spot for Global Bitcoin Mining
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

Currently, the price reflected on Coinbase is ≈ USD$4500 higher than the spot price. (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

If you are bummed about the current bitcoin price fall just look at these bitcoin transactions, which hold the spot for the top transactions ever made on the blockchain, the value of each transaction only increasing over time....

If you are bummed about the current bitcoin price fall just look at these bitcoin transactions, which hold the spot for the top transactions ever made on the blockchain, the value of each transaction only increasing over time.... submitted by primalfabric to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

What if you had all the benefits of Bitcoin with the **price stability** of gold? It now exists and it’s called bitGOLD. Skeptical? I'll give you $1 worth of gold which at current Kitco spot rate is 0.000827 oz. Come make history with us!

Hello /CryptoCurrency,
I’m here to explain what bitGOLD is and why you should pay attention to it.
BitGOLD is exactly like Bitcoin (you hold the private keys) only it’s pegged to the value of real gold. 1 ounce of bitGOLD will always equal the value of 1 ounce of real gold. That means if real gold goes up in value, so does bitGOLD (and vice versa). Think of it as a cryptographic derivative pegged to the value of a real world asset. There is also bitUSD, bitEUR and bitBTC (theoretically any real world asset can be used in this way, even silver, oil and McDonalds big macs - as long as it has a price and is quantifiable).
The main issue with Bitcoin in terms of mainstream adoption has always been its volatility. It goes up and down in value so much it’s impossible to use as a currency. The ideal solution would be to have the best of both worlds: a crypto that you hold the private keys to but is also pegged to the value of either precious metals like gold or a fiat currency like USD.
PLEASE DO NOT DISMISS THIS IDEA JUST BECAUSE YOU MAY CURRENTLY HOLD BITCOIN
For the remainder of this day I will be handing out $1 worth of bitGOLD to all interested redditors (no sock puppets please, I'll know).
This is what you need to do:
STEP #1: Click here to download the Bitshares client.
STEP #2: Locate your public key here and copy and paste it as a reply to >this thread.
When you do this I will reply with further instructions.
Please keep in mind the BitShares software is still in BETA so bear with these complicated steps. They will be phased out very soon.
I truly believe this is the next step in the future of peer-to-peer money and would be more than happy to answer any questions you may have. I understand many of you will be (rightfully) skeptical of this new technology. I am prepared to answer any question, no matter how hard you think it is.
For more technical details on how market pegged assets work, please go to wiki.bitshares.org (an official whitepaper is coming soon).
If you are a member of the press please contact [email protected] for direct communication with our marketing division.
Here’s the technical TL;DR for those interested: (this uses bitUSD as an example, not bitGOLD)
BitShares is an experiment to test the economic theory behind a new kind of prediction market. This experiment creates a decentralized bank and exchange that uses a decentralized transaction ledger secured by DPOS to create fungible digital assets that are market-pegged to the value of anything from dollars, to gold, to gallons of gasoline. BitShares has shares that can be transferred between users in the same way as Bitcoin. What makes BitShares special is that it also implements a business model similar to existing banks or brokerages.
BitShares can create BitUSD by lending it into existence backed by collateral in the same way that the banking system lends dollars into existence today. Whereas your bank uses your house as collateral, BitShares uses BTS as collateral. Short orders are forced to cover when 66% of their collateral is required to cover, leaving the short with 33% of the collateral minus a 5% fee.
The reason someone borrows BitUSD is for the purpose of executing a short sell of BitUSD relative to BTS. This works in the same manner as shorting a stock. First, you borrow the stock, then you sell it at todays high prices. If all goes well then you can buy it back tomorrow for less than you paid today, pay off your loan, and keep the profit. However, if things go against you then you will have to pay more to buy back the stock than you sold it for in the first place and thus take a loss.
BitUSD is created when two people taking opposite positions can agree to a price and the only price at which two people will agree is the current market price of USD in BTS otherwise one individual will start out losing money. The mechanics of the market peg are very similar to the mechanics of a prediction market. Once the market has reached a consensus that BitUSD should be valued the same as a real US Dollar no one will be able to trade against that consensus without losing money. Thus the value of BitUSD today is based upon the prediction of what market participants will value BitUSD at in the future. There is only one rational way to speculate, that the consensus will hold, and that creates a self-enforcing market peg. With BitShares all short positions (those borrowing BitUSD) must start out with enough BTS as collateral to purchase 2x the USD borrowed. Margin calls are executed when the value of the collateral falls to 1.5x the amount borrowed. This gives the market ample opportunity to cover the short position and pay off the loan before there is insufficient collateral. In the event that the market is forced to execute a margin call, a 5% fee will be assessed. This should encourage participants to be pro-active in maintaining sufficient margin.
In the rare event that the value of BTS falls by more than 50% in less than an hour resulting in insufficient collateral, 100% of the collateral will be used to cover as much BitUSD as possible leaving some BitUSD uncovered. The result of this price movement is that some BitUSD will be in circulation without any backing which may or may not impact the market peg of BitUSD to USD. We have two hypothesis as to the market response in this event: in one case the BitUSD will start trading at a discount proportional to the surplus BitUSD in circulation, in the other case the market expectation of a peg to USD will override any surplus supply and BitUSD will continue trading as before. This would be similar to how the dollar did not see an immediate fall to 0 value despite being removed from the gold standard.
submitted by MeTHoDx to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Hublots $25000 Bitcoin Watch Is Perfectly Designed to Help Me Spot Terrible Jabronis (current BTC/USD price is $6542.93934314)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Hublots $25000 Bitcoin Watch Is Perfectly Designed to Help Me Spot Terrible Jabronis
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Blockchain | ICOs
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

@Nasdaq: Nasdaq is working to diversify the customer set in the current digital asset space w/ new products such as a #bitcoin daily performance index & a spot price tracker index. Explore the scope of the products w/ @JillMalandrino at @FIAConnect on #TradeTalks: https://t.co/b6fjCxukiS

@Nasdaq: Nasdaq is working to diversify the customer set in the current digital asset space w/ new products such as a #bitcoin daily performance index & a spot price tracker index. Explore the scope of the products w/ @JillMalandrino at @FIAConnect on #TradeTalks: https://t.co/b6fjCxukiS submitted by -en- to newsbotMARKET [link] [comments]

Guest Spot: Who or What Can Put an End to Bitcoin? (current BTC/USD price is $6449.94419372)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Guest Spot: Who or What Can Put an End to Bitcoin?
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Blockchain | ICOs
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

Bitcoin ATMs showing up in odd spots (current BTC/USD price is $6370.29)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Bitcoin ATMs showing up in odd spots
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Blockchain | ICOs
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

What if you had all the benefits of Bitcoin with the **price stability** of gold? It now exists and it’s called bitGOLD. Skeptical? I'll give you $1 worth of gold which at current Kitco spot rate is 0.000827 oz. Come make history with us!

Hello /Libertarian,
I'm here to explain what bitGOLD is and why you should pay attention to it.
BitGOLD is exactly like Bitcoin (you hold the private keys) only it’s pegged to the value of real gold. 1 ounce of bitGOLD will always equal the value of 1 ounce of real gold. That means if real gold goes up in value, so does bitGOLD (and vice versa). Think of it as a cryptographic derivative pegged to the value of a real world asset. There is also bitUSD, bitEUR and bitBTC (theoretically any real world asset can be used in this way, even silver, oil and McDonalds big macs - as long as it has a price and is quantifiable).
The main issue with Bitcoin in terms of mainstream adoption has always been its volatility. It goes up and down in value so much it’s impossible to use as a currency. The ideal solution would be to have the best of both worlds: a crypto that you hold the private keys to but is also pegged to the value of either precious metals like gold or a fiat currency like USD.
PLEASE DO NOT DISMISS THIS IDEA JUST BECAUSE YOU MAY CURRENTLY HOLD BITCOIN
For the remainder of this day I will be handing out $1 worth of bitGOLD to all interested redditors (no sock puppets please, I'll know).
This is what you need to do:
STEP #1: Click here to download the Bitshares client.
STEP #2: Locate your public key here and copy and paste it as a reply to this thread.
When you do this I will reply with further instructions.
Please keep in mind the BitShares software is still in BETA so bear with these complicated steps. They will be phased out very soon.
I truly believe this is the next step in the future of peer-to-peer money and would be more than happy to answer any questions you may have. I understand many of you will be (rightfully) skeptical of this new technology. I am prepared to answer any question, no matter how hard you think it is.
For more technical details on how market pegged assets work, please go to wiki.bitshares.org (an official whitepaper is coming soon).
If you are a member of the press please contact [email protected] for direct communication with our marketing division.
Here’s the technical TL;DR for those interested: (this uses bitUSD as an example, not bitGOLD)
BitShares is an experiment to test the economic theory behind a new kind of prediction market. This experiment creates a decentralized bank and exchange that uses a decentralized transaction ledger secured by DPOS to create fungible digital assets that are market-pegged to the value of anything from dollars, to gold, to gallons of gasoline. BitShares has shares that can be transferred between users in the same way as Bitcoin. What makes BitShares special is that it also implements a business model similar to existing banks or brokerages.
BitShares can create BitUSD by lending it into existence backed by collateral in the same way that the banking system lends dollars into existence today. Whereas your bank uses your house as collateral, BitShares uses BTS as collateral. Short orders are forced to cover when 66% of their collateral is required to cover, leaving the short with 33% of the collateral minus a 5% fee.
The reason someone borrows BitUSD is for the purpose of executing a short sell of BitUSD relative to BTS. This works in the same manner as shorting a stock. First, you borrow the stock, then you sell it at todays high prices. If all goes well then you can buy it back tomorrow for less than you paid today, pay off your loan, and keep the profit. However, if things go against you then you will have to pay more to buy back the stock than you sold it for in the first place and thus take a loss.
BitUSD is created when two people taking opposite positions can agree to a price and the only price at which two people will agree is the current market price of USD in BTS otherwise one individual will start out losing money. The mechanics of the market peg are very similar to the mechanics of a prediction market. Once the market has reached a consensus that BitUSD should be valued the same as a real US Dollar no one will be able to trade against that consensus without losing money. Thus the value of BitUSD today is based upon the prediction of what market participants will value BitUSD at in the future. There is only one rational way to speculate, that the consensus will hold, and that creates a self-enforcing market peg. With BitShares all short positions (those borrowing BitUSD) must start out with enough BTS as collateral to purchase 2x the USD borrowed. Margin calls are executed when the value of the collateral falls to 1.5x the amount borrowed. This gives the market ample opportunity to cover the short position and pay off the loan before there is insufficient collateral. In the event that the market is forced to execute a margin call, a 5% fee will be assessed. This should encourage participants to be pro-active in maintaining sufficient margin.
In the rare event that the value of BTS falls by more than 50% in less than an hour resulting in insufficient collateral, 100% of the collateral will be used to cover as much BitUSD as possible leaving some BitUSD uncovered. The result of this price movement is that some BitUSD will be in circulation without any backing which may or may not impact the market peg of BitUSD to USD. We have two hypothesis as to the market response in this event: in one case the BitUSD will start trading at a discount proportional to the surplus BitUSD in circulation, in the other case the market expectation of a peg to USD will override any surplus supply and BitUSD will continue trading as before. This would be similar to how the dollar did not see an immediate fall to 0 value despite being removed from the gold standard.
submitted by MeTHoDx to Libertarian [link] [comments]

What if you had all the benefits of Bitcoin with the **price stability** of gold? It now exists and it’s called bitGOLD. Skeptical? I'll give you $1 worth of gold which at current Kitco spot rate is 0.000827 oz. Come make history with us!

Hello /Futurism,
I’m here to explain what bitGOLD is and why you should pay attention to it.
BitGOLD is exactly like Bitcoin (you hold the private keys) only it’s pegged to the value of real gold. 1 ounce of bitGOLD will always equal the value of 1 ounce of real gold. That means if real gold goes up in value, so does bitGOLD (and vice versa). Think of it as a cryptographic derivative pegged to the value of a real world asset. There is also bitUSD, bitEUR and bitBTC (theoretically any real world asset can be used in this way, even silver, oil and McDonalds big macs - as long as it has a price and is quantifiable).
The main issue with Bitcoin in terms of mainstream adoption has always been its volatility. It goes up and down in value so much it’s impossible to use as a currency. The ideal solution would be to have the best of both worlds: a crypto that you hold the private keys to but is also pegged to the value of either precious metals like gold or a fiat currency like USD.
PLEASE DO NOT DISMISS THIS IDEA JUST BECAUSE YOU MAY CURRENTLY HOLD BITCOIN
For the remainder of this day I will be handing out $1 worth of bitGOLD to all interested redditors (no sock puppets please, I'll know).
This is what you need to do:
STEP #1: Click here to download the Bitshares client.
STEP #2: Locate your public key here and copy and paste it as a reply to this thread.
When you do this I will reply with further instructions.
Please keep in mind the BitShares software is still in BETA so bear with these complicated steps. They will be phased out very soon.
I truly believe this is the next step in the future of peer-to-peer money and would be more than happy to answer any questions you may have. I understand many of you will be (rightfully) skeptical of this new technology. I am prepared to answer any question, no matter how hard you think it is.
For more technical details on how market pegged assets work, please go to wiki.bitshares.org (an official whitepaper is coming soon).
If you are a member of the press please contact [email protected] for direct communication with our marketing division.
Here’s the technical TL;DR for those interested: (this uses bitUSD as an example, not bitGOLD)
BitShares is an experiment to test the economic theory behind a new kind of prediction market. This experiment creates a decentralized bank and exchange that uses a decentralized transaction ledger secured by DPOS to create fungible digital assets that are market-pegged to the value of anything from dollars, to gold, to gallons of gasoline. BitShares has shares that can be transferred between users in the same way as Bitcoin. What makes BitShares special is that it also implements a business model similar to existing banks or brokerages.
BitShares can create BitUSD by lending it into existence backed by collateral in the same way that the banking system lends dollars into existence today. Whereas your bank uses your house as collateral, BitShares uses BTS as collateral. If the value of the collateral falls relative to BitUSD then BitShares will automatically cover your loan by selling the BTS held as collateral for BitUSD and giving the borrower the BTS is left over.
The reason someone borrows BitUSD is for the purpose of executing a short sell of BitUSD relative to BTS. This works in the same manner as shorting a stock. First, you borrow the stock, then you sell it at todays high prices. If all goes well then you can buy it back tomorrow for less than you paid today, pay off your loan, and keep the profit. However, if things go against you then you will have to pay more to buy back the stock than you sold it for in the first place and thus take a loss.
BitUSD is created when two people taking opposite positions can agree to a price and the only price at which two people will agree is the current market price of USD in BTS otherwise one individual will start out losing money. The mechanics of the market peg are very similar to the mechanics of a prediction market. Once the market has reached a consensus that BitUSD should be valued the same as a real US Dollar no one will be able to trade against that consensus without losing money. Thus the value of BitUSD today is based upon the prediction of what market participants will value BitUSD at in the future. There is only one rational way to speculate, that the consensus will hold, and that creates a self-enforcing market peg. With BitShares all short positions (those borrowing BitUSD) must start out with enough BTS as collateral to purchase 2x the USD borrowed. Margin calls are executed when the value of the collateral falls to 1.5x the amount borrowed. This gives the market ample opportunity to cover the short position and pay off the loan before there is insufficient collateral. In the event that the market is forced to execute a margin call, a 5% fee will be assessed. This should encourage participants to be pro-active in maintaining sufficient margin.
In the rare event that the value of BTS falls by more than 50% in less than an hour resulting in insufficient collateral, 100% of the collateral will be used to cover as much BitUSD as possible leaving some BitUSD uncovered. The result of this price movement is that some BitUSD will be in circulation without any backing which may or may not impact the market peg of BitUSD to USD. We have two hypothesis as to the market response in this event: in one case the BitUSD will start trading at a discount proportional to the surplus BitUSD in circulation, in the other case the market expectation of a peg to USD will override any surplus supply and BitUSD will continue trading as before. This would be similar to how the dollar did not see an immediate fall to 0 value despite being removed from the gold standard.
submitted by MeTHoDx to Futurism [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Spotted At This Years Burning Man (current BTC/USD price is $7074.97355408)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Bitcoin Spotted At This Years Burning Man
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Blockchain | ICOs
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

[AutoModerator] What if you had all the benefits of Bitcoin with the **price stability** of gold? It now exists and it’s called bitGOLD. Skeptical? I'll give you $1 worth of gold which at current Kitco spot rate is 0.000827 oz. Come make history with us!

submitted by raddit-bot to FuturologyRemovals [link] [comments]

I bought $1k of the Top 10 Cryptos on January 1st, 2018 (Sept Update)

I bought $1k of the Top 10 Cryptos on January 1st, 2018 (Sept Update)
EXPERIMENT - Tracking Top 10 Cryptos of 2018 - Month 33 - Down -76%
See the full blog post with all the tables here.
tl;dr
  • First one to find the three hidden cultural references gets some moons.
  • What's this all about? I purchased $100 of each of Top Ten Cryptos in Jan. 2018, haven't sold or traded. Did the same in 2019 and 2020. Learn more about the history and rules of the Experiments here.
  • September - BTC, although -8%, outperforms the field this month.
  • Overall since Jan. 2018 - Bitcoin miles ahead of the pack, and only one close-ish to break even point.
  • Combining all three three years, Top Ten cryptos underperforming S&P if I'd taken a similar approach.

Month Thirty Three – Down 76%

2018 Top Ten Summary for September
After a rough start to September, crypto spent the month trying in vain to claw back ground. While a few coins rebounded quite a bit from the monthly lows, most ended up finishing the month significantly down. Out of the 2018 Top Ten group, Bitcoin lost the least, down -8% in September. NEM followed it’s winning August (yes, you read that right) with the poorest performance, down -26%.

Question of the month:

Which cryptocurrency exchange won approval to create America’s first crypto bank in September?

A) Binance B) Binance.us C) Kraken D) Coinbase
Scroll down for the answer.

Ranking and September Winners and Losers

Rank of 2018 Portfolio - 50% no longer in Top Ten
A lot of shuffling in September. On the upside, Bitcoin Cash and Cardano gained one place each landing at #5 and #10 respectively. Cardano gets special mention for re-entering the Top Ten.
Heading the wrong direction were IOTA, NEM, Dash, and Stellar each falling two or three spots.
The big story though, for long time crypto watchers, was the ejection of Litecoin from the Top Ten, down five places from #7 to #12 in just one month. For some context, Litecoin’s absence from the Top Ten is a Top Ten Experiment first. It is also the first time since CoinMarketCap has tracked crypto rankings that Litecoin has not been in the Top Ten.
Drop outs: After thirty-three months of this experiment 50% of the cryptos that started 2018 in the Top Ten have dropped out. NEM, Litecoin, Dash, IOTA, and Stellar have been replaced by Binance Coin, Tether, BSV, LINK, and most recently, DOT.
September Winners – Although it lost -8% of its value, this month’s W goes to Bitcoin. ADA gets second place, down -15% and climbing back into the Top Ten.
September Losers – As most probably expected after an extremely out of character victory last month, NEM came back down to earth in September, bigly, down -26%. Litecoin finished right behind, down -24% and dropping out of the Top Ten.
For the overly competitive, below is a tally of the winners of the first 33 months of the 2018 Top Ten Crypto Index Fund Experiment. Bitcoin still has the most monthly wins (8) and Cardano in second place with 6 monthly wins. With its poor September performance, NEM now has 7 monthly losses.
Ws and Ls - One clear winner
Every crypto has at least one monthly win and Bitcoin is unique as the only cryptocurrency that hasn’t lost a month yet since January 2018.

Overall update – BTC solidly in the lead, followed by ETH. Dash in the basement, LTC drops out of the Top Ten.

Even though BTC took a bit of a detour on its way back to break-even point, it is still far ahead of the field, down -17% since January 2018. The initial investment of $100 thirty-three months ago is now worth about $83. Second place Ethereum is down -49% over the same time period.
At this point in the 2018 Top Ten Experiment, Dash is at the bottom. It is currently worth $70.49, down from a January 1st, 2018 starting price of over $1,000. That’s a loss of -93%. The initial $100 invested in Dash 33 months ago is now worth $6.77.
The big story this month is LTC’s departure from the Top Ten, the first time since I started the experiment back in January 2018. Whether or not it will eventually fend off the new generation of coins remains to be seen, but it certainly is noteworthy to have one of the most well known and long standing cryptos drop out of the Top Ten. Consider pouring one out for Litecoin.

Total Market Cap for the entire cryptocurrency sector:

The crypto market lost over $35B in September and is down -39% since January 2018. The value of the overall crypto market is near where it was in August of this year, just a few months back. As painful as the beginning of the month was, looking at a table like this helps with perspective, especially if you’re panic prone.

Bitcoin dominance:

After steadily dipping for months, BitDom increased a bit in September, up to 57.5%.
For some context: since the beginning of the experiment, the range of Bitcoin dominance has been quite wide: we saw a high of 70% BitDom in September 2019 and a low of 33% BitDom in February 2018.

Overall return on $1,000 investment since January 1st, 2018:

The 2018 Top Ten Portfolio lost -$50 this month. If I cashed out today, the $1000 initial investment would return about $238, down -76% from January 2018.
September broke an encouraging upward trend, but at least the portfolio is taking a break from the -80% range. Here’s a look at the ROI over the life of the experiment, month by month, for some context:
33 Monthly ROIs on Top Ten since Jan 2018
The absolute bottom was -88% back in January 2019.
So the Top Ten Cryptos of 2018 are down -76%. What about the 2019 and 2020 Top Tens? Let’s take a look:
So overall? Taking the three portfolios together, here’s the bottom bottom bottom line:
After a $3000 investment in the 2018, 2019, and 2020 Top Ten Cryptocurrencies, my combined portfolios are worth $‭3,340‬ ($238+ $1,538 +$1,564).
That’s up about +11% for the three combined portfolios, compared to +31% last month.
Here’s a table to help visualize:
Combined ROI on $3k over 3 years - UP +11%
That’s a +11% gain by investing $1k on whichever cryptos happened to be in the Top Ten on January 1st for three straight years.
But surely you’d do better if you went all in on one crypto, right?
Depends on your choice. Let’s take a look:

ETH for the win
Only five cryptos have started in the Top Ten for all three years: BTC, ETH, XRP, BCH, and LTC (unless Litecoin can make a comeback by the 1st of Jan. 2021, it’s not going to make the four year club!). Knowing what we know now, which one would have been best to go all in on?
Ethereum, by a pretty good margin: the initial $3k would be up +104%, worth $6,118 today. The worst choice of a basket to put all your eggs in at this point in the experiment is XRP, down by almost one third.

Comparison to S&P 500:

I’m also tracking the S&P 500 as part of the experiment to have a comparison point with other popular investments options. The S&P 500 Index fell from an all time high in August, but is currently up +26% since January 2018.
S&P since Jan. 2018
The initial $1k investment into crypto on January 1st, 2018 would have been worth about $1260 had it been redirected to the S&P.
But what if I took the same invest-$1,000-on-January-1st-of-each-year approach with the S&P 500 that I’ve been documenting through the Top Ten Crypto Experiments? Here are the numbers:
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2018 = $1260 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2019 = $1350 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2020 = $1050 today
Taken together, here’s the bottom bottom bottom line for a similar approach with the S&P:
After three $1,000 investments into an S&P 500 index fund in January 2018, 2019, and 2020, my portfolio would be worth $3,660.
That is up +22% since January 2018, compared to a +11% gain of the combined Top Ten Crypto Experiment Portfolios.
That’s an 11% swing in favor of the S&P 500 and breaks a two month mini-streak of wins from the Top Ten crypto portfolios.
S&P vs. Top Ten Crypto Experiments
That’s seven monthly victories for the S&P vs. two monthly victories for crypto. The largest gap so far was a 22% difference in favor of the S&P in June.

Conclusion:

September was a tough month for both traditional and crypto markets. What’s next for the rest of 2020? More volatility is no doubt to come as we enter the last quarter of a truly unpredictable and exhausting year. Buckle up.
Thanks for reading and for supporting the experiment. I hope you’ve found it helpful. I continue to be committed to seeing this process through and reporting along the way. Feel free to reach out with any questions and stay tuned for progress reports. Keep an eye out for my parallel projects where I repeat the experiment twice, purchasing another $1000 ($100 each) of two new sets of Top Ten cryptos as of January 1st, 2019 then again on January 1st, 2020.

And the Answer is…

C) Kraken
According to an official announcement in September, Kraken is “the first digital asset company in U.S. history to receive a bank charter recognized under federal and state law.”
submitted by Joe-M-4 to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Unilend Finance - Listing Soon, Moonshot Expected

Hi friends, i want to tell you about UniLend project which will be listed soon.
First of all i want to tell you, Unilend team announced that CertiK has audited UFT smart contract.
The blockchain security pioneer is one of the most advanced auditors in whole-chain, smart contracts, and VAPT verification in the scene.
Certik's best-in-class cybersecurity experts have delivered end-to-end security audits for over 220 clients, including over 118k lines of code, and now UFT smart contracts as well.
Here is the announcement by the CertiK:
UniLend is a permission-less decentralized protocol that combines spot trading services and money markets with lending and borrowing services through smart contracts.
UniLend Features
*Permissionless listing: Any ERC20 token will be able to list without any entity controlling the listing process, making UniLend’s features accessible to every token.
*Lending & borrowing: Users have the capability to unlock their token’s functionality for lending to receive an interest rate and for borrowing by paying an interest rate.
*Trading: A corresponding trading pair will also operate on UniLend's platform to include decentralized spot trading functionality for platform users.
*Governance: The protocol will be governed by its token holders through proposals in order to ensure adjustments to the protocol are made with a majority consensus.
*Liquidity: By providing liquidity for asset trading and loans on Unilend's platform, users are able to receive fees in proportion to their liquidity pool stake.
*Native Utility Token: The native utility token of UniLend will be UFT, Unilend Finance Token. The token will have multiple use cases for governance, platform utility, and much more.
How is UniLend different to existing DeFi protocols?
Existing DeFi solutions have left the majority of digital assets outside of the DeFi ecosystem. There are over 6000 tokens listed on coinmarketcap. However, the current platforms such as Compound, Aave, Maker DAO, and many more, support less than 30 assets.Some protocols offer lending and borrowing with a limited set of tokens while others offer the freedom to trade any ERC20 assets but neglect the lending and borrowing aspect.
UniLend is bridging that gap by combining the decentralization aspect of enabling any ERC20 to be utilized as collateral for lending & borrowing whilst providing the flexibility for users to also trade their assets in-platform. Ultimately, UniLend aims to unlock the full potential of digital assets for their owners.
Investors
UniLend Successfully Raises $3.1M in Seed and Private Sale Rounds Amid Overwhelming Strategic Investor Support
Unilend funding rounds attracted the attention of some of the industry’s heaviest hitters, including Woodstock Fund, Signal Ventures, 3Commas, Danish Chaudhry (Head of Bitcoin Exchange), Jay Putera (Partner at CryptoBriefing ), TRG Capital, BTC12 Capital, AU21 Capital, Youbi Capital, TomoChain, Bidesk, Bibox, Tenzor Capital, and Sandeep Nailwal (Co-founder of Matic Network).
Tokenomics
*Platform: ERC20
*Total Supply: 100,000,000 UFT
*Initial Circulating Supply: 7,777,778 (7,78%)
*Seed Round Price: $0,07 (25% released after 6 months, 25% after 12 months, 25% after 15 months and 25% after 18 months)
*Seed Round Hardcap: $700,000 (reached)
*Private Round Price: $0,12 (25% release at TGE, 25% after 3 months, 25% after 6 months and 25% after 9 months)
*Private Round Hardcap: $2,400,000 (reached)
*Public Sale: Interest form is cloesed,lottery done with partneeship Chainlink VFR, KYC process ongoing. (Hardcap: $150,000, oversubscription)
There will be a voting for Bithumb Global Listing on October 15th - 12:00 to 16:59 (UTC+8)
Conclusion
UniLend protocol is working to create a new niche in the market which has been neglected and untapped by current solutions in the DeFi space. I believe team efforts will create a level playing field in the market by enabling every token to be a part of the growing DeFi ecosystem.
submitted by walklineua to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

We just broke 35,000,000 MOON in circulation

You can track the data here in rinkeby etherscan
We’re almost at 8,700 holders not including xmoon with 20,000 transfers.
At current prices this translates to a market cap of $1,400,000 which puts it around the market cap of Banano at spot ~800 according to coingecko.
For reference:
The XDAI governance token STAKE has ~8,200 holders, 115,000 transfers and a market cap of $115,000,000.
DOGE currently has a market cap of $338,000,000
Bitcoin Gold currently has a market cap of $144,000,000
submitted by nanooverbtc to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

[WTS] Recent US Mint Platinum/Gold/Silver, Certified Pre-1933 Gold, Pandas, Lots of Nice Stuff

Prices are firm; however, I am willing to combine or eliminate shipping costs if you are buying more than one lot. "SPOT" refers to the melt value of the coin given the current spot price. FOR BITCOIN SALES I WILL KNOCK 1% OFF PRICE
I am also looking to trade for 1 oz carded gold bars. I would count those as 1 oz SPOT + $40 in trade value.
Verification: https://imgur.com/QtcEZ6e , https://imgur.com/hXj8EqB , https://imgur.com/a/9XLS5zL
For boxed stuff, all government packaging and COAs included.
Lot 1: 1985 1 oz 100 Yuan Gold Panda NGC MS68 - SPOT + $125 SHIPPED
Lot 2: 2001 1 oz 500 Yuan Gold Panda - SPOT + $110 SHIPPED (I wouldn't call this coin BU but it's OK)
Lot 3: 1892 $10 Gold Liberty NGC MS62 - $1050 SHIPPED
Lot 4: 1904 $20 Gold Liberty PCGS MS62 - $2130 SHIPPED
Lot 5: 1873 $20 Gold Liberty NGC AU50 - $2175 SHIPPED
Lot 6: 2015 $100 Ultra High Relief Proof Liberty - $2150 SHIPPED
Lot 7: 2017 1 oz Gold $100 Ultra High Relief Proof Liberty - $2150 SHIPPED
Lot 8: 2020 BU Basketball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $590 SHIPPED
Lot 9: 2020 Proof Basketball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $590 SHIPPED
Lot 10: 2016 1/10 oz 24K Gold Mercury Dime - $280 SHIPPED (1 of 3 SOLD, 2 LEFT)
Lot 11: 2016 1/4 oz 24K Standing Liberty Quarter Gold - $560 SHIPPED
Lot 12: 2018 1/10 oz High Relief Gold Liberty Proof - $245 SHIPPED (1 of 3 SOLD, 2 LEFT)
Lot 13: 2014 BU Baseball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $525 SHIPPED
Lot 14: 2014 Proof Baseball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $505 SHIPPED
Lot 15: 1836 $2.50 Classic Head Gold - $410 SHIPPED (this coin has been cleaned, but if you want a really old USA gold coin, it's still a great buy)
Lot 16: 1986 California Grizzly Bear 1 oz Gold Round - SPOT + $90 SHIPPED
SOLD SOLD Lot 17: 1990 Australia $100 1 oz Gold Nugget - $2010 SHIPPED SOLD SOLD
SOLD SOLD Lot 18: 2014 1/4 oz Gold Libertad - $550 SHIPPED SOLD SOLD
Lot 19: 1994 "Royal Hawaiin Mint" 1/10 oz Gold Coin - $300
Lot 20: 1915 Austria 100 Corona Gold Coin (restrikes, 0.9802 AGW) - SPOT + $55 SHIPPED
Lot 21: 1906 Gold HALF Sovereign (.1178 AGW) - $235 SHIPPED
Lot 22: 2008 Proof Krugerrand Set - 1 oz Gold & 5 Rand Oom Paul Coin - $2300 SHIPPED
Lot 23: 2008 Natura Giants of Africa Elephant Set, 1 oz Proof Gold Coin + 24K Gold PLATED Sterling Silver Elephant Sculpture (4 grams) - $2100 SHIPPED
Lot 24: 2013 Britannia 5 Coin Silver Proof Set - $205 SHIPPED
Lot 25: Apollo 5 oz Silver Proof - $235 SHIPPED
Lot 26: 2009 1 oz Platinum Preamble Series - $1510 SHIPPED
I take responsibility for shipping. If tracking says it was delivered or that it was out for delivery (they sometimes forget to do final scan), I consider it delivered. If tracking says it got lost or package damaged and empty, I will reimburse you fully or give you the same product if possible.
Payment options in order of preference: BTC, Zelle, Venmo, PPGS+3%. PPGS will only be available to users with a lot of feedback. I'll be going to sleep soon so I will start going through my messages tomorrow morning.
Thanks for looking and please let me know if I am doing anything wrong or inadvisable.
submitted by KeepStackinSon to Pmsforsale [link] [comments]

Unilend Finance - Public Sale Form is Open

Hi friends, i want to tell you about UniLend project which will be listed on October 15th.
UniLend is a permission-less decentralized protocol that combines spot trading services and money markets with lending and borrowing services through smart contracts.

UniLend Features
*Permissionless listing: Any ERC20 token will be able to list without any entity controlling the listing process, making UniLend’s features accessible to every token.
*Lending & borrowing: Users have the capability to unlock their token’s functionality for lending to receive an interest rate and for borrowing by paying an interest rate.
*Trading: A corresponding trading pair will also operate on UniLend's platform to include decentralized spot trading functionality for platform users.
*Governance: The protocol will be governed by its token holders through proposals in order to ensure adjustments to the protocol are made with a majority consensus.
*Liquidity: By providing liquidity for asset trading and loans on Unilend's platform, users are able to receive fees in proportion to their liquidity pool stake.
*Native Utility Token: The native utility token of UniLend will be UFT, Unilend Finance Token. The token will have multiple use cases for governance, platform utility, and much more.

How is UniLend different to existing DeFi protocols?
Existing DeFi solutions have left the majority of digital assets outside of the DeFi ecosystem. There are over 6000 tokens listed on coinmarketcap. However, the current platforms such as Compound, Aave, Maker DAO, and many more, support less than 30 assets.Some protocols offer lending and borrowing with a limited set of tokens while others offer the freedom to trade any ERC20 assets but neglect the lending and borrowing aspect.
UniLend is bridging that gap by combining the decentralization aspect of enabling any ERC20 to be utilized as collateral for lending & borrowing whilst providing the flexibility for users to also trade their assets in-platform. Ultimately, UniLend aims to unlock the full potential of digital assets for their owners.

Investors
UniLend Successfully Raises $3.1M in Seed and Private Sale Rounds Amid Overwhelming Strategic Investor Support

Unilend funding rounds attracted the attention of some of the industry’s heaviest hitters, including Woodstock Fund, Signal Ventures, 3Commas, Danish Chaudhry (Head of Bitcoin.com Exchange), Jay Putera (Partner at CryptoBriefing.com), TRG Capital, BTC12 Capital, AU21 Capital, Youbi Capital, TomoChain, Bidesk, Bibox, Tenzor Capital, and Sandeep Nailwal (Co-founder of Matic Network).

Tokenomics
*Platform: ERC20
*Total Supply: 100,000,000 UFT
*Initial Circulating Supply: 7,777,778 (7,78%)
*Seed Round Price: $0,07 (25% released after 6 months, 25% after 12 months, 25% after 15 months and 25% after 18 months)
*Seed Round Hardcap: $700,000 (reached)
*Private Round Price: $0,12 (25% release at TGE, 25% after 3 months, 25% after 6 months and 25% after 9 months)
*Private Round Hardcap: $2,400,000 (reached)
*Public Sale: Will be done early next week, Hardcap $150,000, interest form (open for 24 hours) + whitelist (lottery) + sale FCFS - Fixed Personal Cap: 3 ETH (Public Sale form is open now)


UFT token will be listed on October 15th on Uniswap.

**Conclusion*\*
UniLend protocol is working to create a new niche in the market which has been neglected and untapped by current solutions in the DeFi space. I believe team efforts will create a level playing field in the market by enabling every token to be a part of the growing DeFi ecosystem.

Website Twitter Telegram Linkedin Medium Reddit
submitted by waterbottles4 to ICOAnalysis [link] [comments]

If you haven't understood xBTC up until this point, this might make it click

They just released a new Medium post that really details out what xBTC aims to be. It is a new way of placing a spot price on chain and making it tradable. They have done this with Bitcoin Market Cap Dominance (which is impossible to trade currently), making it a tradable spot price.
Through liquidity pools it can actually become a collatoralized spot price, if it is in a liquidity pool with $1,000,000 ETH/$1,000,000 xBTC and ETH doubles in price that pool needs to rebalance to be 50/50, it doesn't perfectly sell 25% of the ETH to "buy" xBTC but it still rebalances pulling up xBTC's price.
This is a new way of imagining synthetic assets and specifically derivatives, but it is better than other derivatives, they state for these reasons:
"i. We are a first of our kind dominance derivative, you can’t find this anywhere else, currently
ii. There is no strike price or expiration date
iii. No margin or margin call
iv. Tokenized and simplified as an ERC 20 token
v. Decentralized and agnostic (available anywhere and everywhere)
vi. Immutable and transparent, all movements are on the blockchain and verifiable. This means there is no wizard behind the curtain that can trade against users or abuse users, as the laws of the ecosystem are immutable and transparent.
There is no walled garden, new interface to learn, KYC, or technical skill needed to use xBTC. Looking at Robinhood options/derivatives are a huge growth edge (that is: making options/derivatives easily tradeable), a majority of payments to Robinhood were off their options last quarter. We are creating the most simplified, decentralized, and fluid version of a derivative you can make on the blockchain."
They have already released their staking platform (the Mint), similar to AMPL's geyser program, and have an up and running dashboard (just two weeks after launch). It's a non-anonymous team with great partners supporting them.
If you haven't understood xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300 xBTC up until this point, this might make it click76/300the presale market cap (launched at 2.5 million now around 1.3 million), it has a lot of potential if AMPL is any judge of character. Take some time to read the medium post, it puts forward a pretty strong argument. Mainly making the point that AMPL had some of the biggest backers you can have showing it's a revolutionary idea, xBTC tweaks it just one step further, they have an idea that is vetted by all these big names (rebasing to create a target market price) but you now have a chance to get in on the ground level and they are much more decentralized than AMPL was at launch.
submitted by derelick to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

Most of "toxicity" on this subreddit is justified

There have been a few posts recently with overwhelming upvotes about how this community is toxic, calling it one of the most toxic communities and similar stuff.So I looked through most of the arguments people in comments are making to justify such believe, most of them are pointing out how the toxic people are calling the game "broken", "unplayable", "full of hackers" "full of complainers" or saying that " it makes me not want to come back with almost every other post with someone new bitching ", many upvoted posts talking about how this community "keep bitching" I've seen people talking how people attack Nikita, bsg, also that there are toxic people writing stuff like get good, " Any time I see someone share a small victory it is met with rude comments and hostility"" Oh man you got a squad wipe? Wish the enemies in my game were that bad, you suck they suck , Y DO I DIE TO PRO PLAYERS WHILE YOU PLAY AGAINST BOTZ. "So first off I want to define the terms, toxicity is defined as " the quality of being very harmful or unpleasant in a pervasive or insidious way. " by fast google search. I assume that when people call all those people "bitching" toxic they say so because they believe they are harmful overall. I would argue that the people calling out those "crybabes" toxic are more toxic and harmful to a game than those people they are calling out.
My theory is that there are two groups of people on this subreddit, I will call the first complainers, and the second one anti-complainers, which are people complaining about complainers.
The first one is the one including everybody that is criticizing or complaining about game, bugs, gameplay changes, performance, loadings, also people that attack developers personally or just insults them, or just rude comments with hostility. Includes anybody who shares his negative thoughts about the game in either constructive argumentive post or REEing and talking the game is trash.
The second group are people who complains how much toxicity is on this subreddit, saying it things like it was much better before it got popular, the group can include any person who feels like its toxic, by the most part saying that complainers constantly whine, are rude in comments and attack developers. People who brush off most of actual valid criticism of the game (EVEN if complainer complained about it, complaining about stuff in the game doesnt make the criticism any less valid) with stuff like "It's beta", "It's early access game", "play another game", "stop playing if you dont like the game", "stop bitching", "its just pixels", " It's like, I get it, but I've been here for two weeks and I'm not bitching and I've played many betas and whatnot. It's just not that bad. It really isn't." Also includes people that say that developers are doing their best, doing appreciation threads of nikita, believing that game is in a good spot and that it was much worse and we should appreciete it.
I think that a lot of people are in first group because most people have had at least some criticism of the game but they consider themselves as the anti-complainer because the bad parts of complainers that attack developers, or just complain a lot, not liking the game direction, REE'ing or not. That explains why when there are anti-complainer posts about toxic people they have from 70% to 90% upvote rate, but know if you ever found yourself commenting "delete gl" "game stutters" "late spawning again" know that those posts about toxic people are also talking about YOU, yes, YOU.
If you have not already realized, I consider myself complainer, I think that the game has a lot of problems, and even though this is my first problem on this subreddit I have a lot to complain.Just to give you some backstory on me, I started playing this wipe, I think I started playing maybe between 3 to 2 months in this game. Im addicted to it, I love this game, but I hate it at the same time.Why?Because the performance of this game, overall slugginess, infinite loads, late spawns, freezes, stutters, many bugs, desyncs, silent grenades, random disconnects mid raid, coming back to menu for 5 minutes every other raid, menu errors, trader errors, new bugs introduced any new patch that can suddenly delete your item cases that you spend a lot of time on, FiR required for quests with random chances to spawn on scavs, me fearing that I can be banned if I drop something to my friend because of rmt problem, me not being able to play with my close friend without need to wait for one of them for few minutes (they all have ssds), while one of my friends is unable to play any other map with me than factory because he is in infinite loading everytime when he tries.
I am complainer, but nobody defends complainers that attack developers personally and deathtreat nikita, screw those people. When it comes to people that are rude and negative in comments, I dont believe there are a lot of them at all, the only negative comments I can find is usually at the bottom of any post, with no upvotes or downvoted. If that was a problem people like this would be upvoted much more. I dont think i really happens much, but you can try to prove me wrong if you want.
The part of complainers I want to focus on that I believe are justified, are those people complaining about balances issues, bugs, even by saying "constant freezes" and "gl sucks"Every comment like this that has a sentiment about something in game has value.the things like just "Fuck the game" or "fuck developers" have no reason of why the person doesnt approve the game and developers, so I wont defend people that just do that because it has no value, its just being a dick.But when it comes to anybody that complains about specific bug and just shows disapproval about some change is good, its feedback, even though in can be inflammatory I consider it good until it doesnt derive into personally attacking developers. I think complains being inflammatory mostly just tells you how a lot of tarkov community just feels frustrated about the game state, mostly bugs.
So as a complainer myself I will respond to anti-complainers arguments that I've came across calling out complainers for being toxic (harmful to community).
"It's a beta" - even if I would grant you that, the fact that game is a beta doesnt mean that you cannot complain about something being broken, its actually the best time to fix the game because it is beta, so more feedback the better, while having something broken and having bugs that are very old and still not fixed is very frustraiting. This aside, I dont care about it being a "beta" it doesnt act as one, it keeps having content updates, getting trailers of content updates (trailers for a game that isnt even out, and it wont be even out after the content trailer is about, what even is this?)I has big price tags with different stages with different items for each, it doesnt seem to focus on fixing the bug, it focuses on keep adding content for people. The feedback option about the game is not ever promoted.In4 everybody comments how x games are also betas, I dont care, it doesnt matter, tarkov been in "early access" for years already, and it doesnt seem to even want ever get out of it, it is beta status is just used by community to dodge a lot of criticism.
"Play another game"/"If you don't like it, go away" - Why would I? It's not that I dont like that game, I love it, but there are a lot of frustraiting things that can be changed and I wouldnt have those problems. Complaining is for developers to do action to make things better. It is silly to think that if you point out problems in a game you have to hate it, its the opposite, I complain about it because I want it fixed so it will be no longer problem when playing this awesome game.
"This beta really isn't that bad"/ "It used to be much worse" - It can be pretty damn bad depending what maps you play, how much you play, what bugs you come across, or just rng of getting a cheater in a game or even getting banned from a game because you dropped some bitcoins to friend or some error bsg did.Saying that it used to be much worse doesnt help in anything, it is just used to brush off the problems with the current game. It is the same as saying to a person that is jewish or black that is telling you it is being discriminated "It used to be much worse for jews you know? They used to be gassed long ago", or to black people "Its much better now, there is no slavery". it just pointless to say. Problems before doesnt mean that you cant have problems right now.
"Stop playing if you dont like the game"/"take a break" - There is no game close to tarkov, and I want to play tarkov, I just dont want problems that I get when playing it. It's not that I don't like the game but I don't like in what direction it goes, developers proritize making content instead of fixing the game. It already has damn a lot of content right now, why cant they just focus on fixing the problems, making it smooth and playable, release it and then adding content to it?
"Stop bitching" - There are a lots of problems in tarkov, if you think tarkov has no valid problems you must have not played this game at all or must be delusional. And all the other brush offs I already responded to above. I will and most people should too complain about it, I completely doesnt understand the logic of anti complainers, its literally just bitching about bitching, very ironic.I think every patch just proves the priorities of developers, we had gl's last patch and now we got flashing shotgun meleeing people with stash sorting deleting items, and thats after they delayed the patch by 5 days.(I dont care if patches are late, but I care about giving patch date and then delaying it, if you are not sure if the patch will be fine that just give patch date week later)
I think that anti-complainers are more harmful to game than complainers, not only it makes home war at subreddit blaming everybody of being toxic, it also just has a lot of people that shrug off the problems that most complainers talk about that are actually valid criticism, which in the long run means less room to improvement the game because most of people with complains are called toxic.
In the end all, me and many other people want is just to have good experience and I think that bugs make it a lot more harder to love this otherwise awesome game. Lets make peace between complainers and anti-complainers, being able to criticize game while being able to appreciete what was done until now.
Edit: tl;dr, Most people that are considered toxic in this community are just people that point out problems with a game that is required for game to grow and get better, even though it is showed mostly by complaining it has still value and just shows how big part of community are anoyyed at glaring problems.
submitted by PleyVI to EscapefromTarkov [link] [comments]

[WTS] Recent US Mint Gold and Silver - 1/10 oz Merc Dimes, 1/4 oz SLQs, BBall HoF, UHR Gold

[WTS] Recent US Mint Gold and Silver
Prices are firm; however, I am willing to combine or eliminate shipping costs if you are buying more than one lot. "SPOT" refers to the melt value of the coin given the current spot price. FOR BITCOIN SALES I WILL KNOCK 1% OFF PRICE
I am also looking to trade for 1 oz carded gold bars. I would count those as 1 oz SPOT + $40 in trade value.
Verification: https://imgur.com/a/jRGCmkW
All government packaging and COAs included unless noted in bold.
SOLD SOLD Lot 1: 2016 1/10 oz 24K Gold Mercury Dime - $275 SHIPPED SOLD SOLD
Lot 2: 2017 1 oz Gold $100 Ultra High Relief Proof Liberty MISSING COA - $2150 SHIPPED
SOLD SOLD Lot 2: 2019 1 oz Gold $100 Ultra High Relief Proof Liberty - $2350 SHIPPED SOLD SOLD
Lot 4: 2019 Apollo 5 oz Silver Proof - $245 SHIPPED
Lot 5: 2019 Liberty High Relief Silver Medal (2.5 oz) - $95 SHIPPED
Lot 6: 2016 1/4 oz 24K Standing Liberty Quarter Gold - $560 SHIPPED
Lot 7: 2020 BU Basketball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $600 SHIPPED
Lot 8: 2020 Proof Basketball Hall of Fame $5 Gold (0.2419 oz AGW) - $600 SHIPPED
SOLD SOLD Lot 9: 2013 $50 1 oz Gold Buffalo REVERSE Proof - SPOT + $150 SOLD SOLD
Lot 10: 2015 $100 Ultra High Relief Proof Liberty - $2150 SHIPPED
Lot 11: 2018 1/10 oz High Relief Gold Liberty Proof - $265 SHIPPED
Edit: I have multiples of almost everything listed. I am going to be adding pictures today because I have a lot of interest in certain lots.
I take responsibility for shipping. If tracking says it was delivered or that it was out for delivery (they sometimes forget to do final scan), I consider it delivered. If tracking says it got lost or package damaged and empty, I will reimburse you fully or give you the same product if possible.
Payment options in order of preference: BTC, Zelle, Venmo, PPGS+3%. PPGS will only be available to users with a lot of feedback. I'll be going to sleep soon so I will start going through my messages tomorrow morning.
Thanks for looking and please let me know if I am doing anything wrong or inadvisable.
submitted by KeepStackinSon to Pmsforsale [link] [comments]

[WTS] Certified Gold Coins

Prices are firm; however, I am willing to combine or eliminate shipping costs if you are buying more than one lot. "SPOT" refers to the melt value of the coin given the current spot price. FOR BITCOIN SALES I WILL KNOCK 1% OFF PRICE
I am also looking to trade for 1 oz carded gold bars. I would count those as 1 oz SPOT + $40 in trade value. So for example, two of the $10 Spouse coins would trade straight up for a 1 oz carded gold bar.
Verification: https://imgur.com/a/lggWOUa
SOLD SOLD SOLD Lot 1: 2009 Japan 10,000 Yen 20 Gram Gold PCGS PR70DCAM w/ COA - SPOT + $50
Lot 2: 1991 $50 Proof Gold Eagle 1 oz NGC PF70UCAM - $2425
Lot 3: 1996 $50 Proof Gold Eagle 1 oz NGC PF70UCAM - $2250
Lot 4: 2008-W Proof $5 Gold (0.2419 AGW) Bald Eagle NGC PF70UCAM - $525
Lot 5: #1 2008-W Buffalo $10 Gold 1/4 oz (rare) NGC MS70 - $1125 (ignore sticker)
Lot 6: #2 2008-W Buffalo $10 Gold 1/4 oz (rare) NGC MS70 - $1125
SOLD SOLD SOLD Lot 7: 2007 Bermuda $30 San Pedro 1.0113 Gold NGC Gem Proof - SPOT + $60
Lot 8: 2010-P Australia $50 Koala 1/2 oz Gold PCGS Gem Proof - SPOT + $50
Lot 9: Presidential Spouse $10 Gold Coins (0.500 AGW) - SPOT + $20 (3 available)
Lot 10: 2008-W Buffalo $25 Gold 1/2 oz (rare) NGC MS70 - $1375 (ignore sticker)
Any one of the slabbed coins can come with a nice display box if you add $9.00
https://imgur.com/SiAHVtW
Shipping: USPS First Class $4, Priority $10. I'll try to combine / eat shipping as much as I can for multiple lot orders. Shipping to USA only.
I take responsibility for shipping. If tracking says it was delivered or that it was out for delivery (they sometimes forget to do final scan), I consider it delivered. If tracking says it got lost or package damaged and empty, I will reimburse you fully or give you the same product if possible.
Payment options in order of preference: BTC, Zelle, Venmo, PPGS+3%, PPFF no notes (edit: sorry, can't take anymore PPFF)
Thanks for looking and please let me know if I am doing anything wrong or inadvisable.
submitted by KeepStackinSon to Pmsforsale [link] [comments]

List of current UI/UX issues & possible QoL improvements (Megathread?)

As some of you know, I only make stupidly long posts and also like to humbly brag about being a software engineer with fairly decent experience in QA, automated testing and testing in general (6+ years a C# dev).
This is my personal list of things that either make no sense, are unpleasant, incoherent, or could be improved.
Please feel free to add to the list, I will come back and edit every day.
Numbers are also here to help you quote & provide your own criticism.
Note that is is done with the following optimization mindset, in order of importance :
As you can see I worked under the assumption that the average player wants to spend more time in raid rather than in inventory ; obviously this falls apart if that is not the case. To do that I try to improve time spent on searching / arranging things without creating unecessary automation or remove important/immersive aspects of the game, even in inventory. I also try to improve time spent clicking through various windows as currently a lot of them are done to be fast & easy to for the devs, not for the players. I want to emphasize that I'm okay with that. I know the importance of having sub-optimal navigation to help you find out what your better navigation is. I also know a complete rework is not always possible, that is why I made my list without changing too much of the menus as well as keeping the vibe/current feel of those menus.
Keywords like should & could are used as intended ; since this is not a professional report I'm emphasizing here, the meaning of the word is important. Should means it is adding an improvement over an existing issue, could means it's a possible improvement but requires further investigation. Would means investigation was done and is just one possible outcome usually relevant within the context.
Please note that most of us now are very used to the current UI/UX, which will generate two reactions:
- "It's fine as it is because I can do it quite fast."
- "I don't want it to change again, I'm used to it now."
I cannot emphasize how unefficient it is to let those emotions get the best of you. UI/UX is the study of common sense & ease of use in an interface. You should never have to get used to anything, it should be fluid and intuitive. If you think you're fast now, that means it's possible to be slow. This is extremely bad for a UI/UX standpoint. Everybody should be able to navigate/understand the menus just as fast the 1st time than the 100th time (ideally). Keep this in mind when you read everything down here, because some stuff you probably won't like at first glance, but you will get used to it very fast, and you will gain a lot of time in the future, as well as new players.

1. Autostacking of items

Money & Ammo. When a stackable item or stack of items enter an inventory, it should autostack itself to an available non-full stack, then fill other available stacks until there aren't any. At that point, the item should just go at the top of the inventory as it is doing now. Autostacking should *not* browse for sublayers of inventory.
Items drag & dropped on an inventory slot should not be auto-stacked either (drag & drop overrides autostacking).
It would autostack when control clicking, or using "Receive all" from another inventory, or when dropping into a sublayer without selecting a specific slot.
Autostacking should only stack FiR items together and non FiR items together.

Example 1

Drag & Dropping would not stack in the same inventory layer. Drag & dropping would override auto stacking.

Dragging over the money case would auto stack in the inventory of the case.

Using Ammo as example here. If you drag & drop directly on a slot (even in an inventory sublayer), you would override autostacking.

2. Highlighting of full stacks

Stacks at full capacity could be highlighted for easier inventory management.
Many aspects could be used to highlight (either the name of the item, or the value, or the background of the cell)

Apology for the poor photoshop skills

This could be a highlighting method

This could be a highlighting method

3. Consistent item order in hideout craft list

Currently when in the workbench (and I think others? now I doubt), the list of craftable items appears to be random. The order should always be the same for consistency. Does not provide meaningful gameplay experience to have to "look for the recipe" every time.

4. Collecting crafts

Hideout stations could display the finished craft on top for easy collection of craft, or there could be a "Get Items" or "Receive All" elsewhere to avoid unecessary scrolling. This is uncessary if ongoing crafts are moved on top of the list, or if the list is autoscrolled to the ongoing craft.
"Collect All" on station level is not the best idea. If you go in a station, it's probably better that you know what you're collecting. I suggest moving the relevant craft on top or auto scrolling and not adding "receive all" on station level, although it would be a good help.
This should be investigated.

Receive All or Get Items could be moved or added at the top or bottom of the window.

5. "Receive All" could exist at hideout level

The same way we "receive all" from a trader, it would be nice to "Receive all" from the hideout. Either in the form of a trader (in which we can receive all / pick manually from) or by instantly putting it in inventory. If there is enough space it just works. If there isn't, it displays an error like it already does.
This is not mutually exclusive with the previous suggestion.

6. Display crafts readyness/collection

6.1 Hideout
The current behaviour is partially coherent. You get notified when an item is sold, and you get notified when a craft is finished.
You have a display notification "Attachment" style when a trader has something for you, and you should get a display notification "attachment" style when the hideout has something for you.
Ideally, there should also be such notifications for currently unused station


Receive all on the right, Nutrition unit has finished crafting and Lavatory is currently NOT crafting

6.2 Traders
There should be a way of knowing if something is waiting in trader inventory on a global level (quest rewards, money, insurance, unsold market items returns), like the nofication. The "new item" notification could be always visible as long as items are in the trader inventories, compared to now where it disappears as soon as you either click it or visit the messenger. In this hypothesis, there could be a change of color in the notification to show that there are still item waiting including some that haven't been seen yet (to still fulfill the current role of the notification)

7. CTA's

Note : CTA = Call to Action, it's the button your user will press 99.3% of the time. Example, in the launcher, it's the "Start Game". Clearly visible, easily accessible, highlighted, much bigger, and at a very common CTA spot. That one is great.
Some others are not.
7.1. "Receive All" should not be displayed when there is nothing to receive.
7.2 "Get" in single transaction messages from Ragman could be removed. There is no reason to take single items from the window when you can receive it all at once.
7.3 A "group collect" Receive all action could be added when you click on the attachment notification, or as an extra action next to the notification (just like shown on the Hideout in figure 6.0) that would specifically collect all. it would loop through all conversations and collect all and dump at the top of stash, either until its finished or there is not enough room, in which case it displays an error. It could also work like the scav case and not pick up anything until you have room, and in that case you would go in the window manually and/or make room (like we do now).
7.3 The "Receive all" is at the bottom when most CTAs in the game is at the top (dealer tabs, market tabs, character sheet tabs, settings...). Save in the settings is at the bottom too. It is incoherent. It would make more sense to have all CTAs at the bottom and options/tabs/menus at the top.
7.4 The "DEAL" button in trader view is much smaller and less visible than the "Fill Item" checkbox. The CTA should be getting more attention than a setting. New players pretty much *never* see it first and look around the "Fill Item" with eyes & mouse.

DEAL should be at the bottom in the current \"Fill Item\" box. Fill Items should be removed entirely.
7.5 Quests could be automatically accepted (no need for CTA). I don't see a reason why someone would not accept a quest. The only reason we're Accepting them now is to let the user know he has a new quest. There are other means of notifying players of new stuff : usually notifications. If not, that button should at least be more visible/highlighted. Every new player ( 100%! ) I coach does not see it at first and never looks at the right spot the first time.
7.6 "Insure All" is the most commonly used button in the insurance screen and could be emphasized more.

Example 7.5

8. Remove "Fill Items"

The Fill Items to automatically fill the trader's requirements should be removed and set as the default behaviour. There is no need to fill items manually nor tell the game to do so.

9. Expire / Delete pending requests

Friend requests should be cancellable and could expire. Requests should not be stuck until another user acts on them. Right clicking the request could display a "Cancel" or "Delete" request button.
Ideally, the cell should include a CTA on the right, as the only action I would ever do in a cell in this context is cancel.
Opening a submenu with only 1 item means you should not be opening a submenu, but displaying a button where the user right clicked instead.

I can only re-send a friend request to someone that already denied me. This is incoherent.

10. Market Rows

From my somewhat small sample (about 60 players), nobody uses the expand button on the top right of a cell (see below). I think everybody uses the right click on item instead.

An expanded cell with context menu opened, and a collapsed cell
The extra information available on the right is the exact same as a right click, but is hidden behind a left click. This is incoherent.
The only difference is the profile picture that I only get from expanding, but currently we all have the same one. This would need to be investigated.

This could be an improvement, displaying the CTA's immediately (although BUY is definitely way too small). Notice profile picture on the left
10.1 The expandable cell feature should be removed altogether, as the other options are available on right click.
10.2 The whole row should provide the same context menu (right click).
10.3 The "Send friend request" could be included in the row's context menu, or could be removed entirely, as right now most requests are missclicks. Adding the Send Friend Request at the bottom of the context menu on the row would reduce the amount of missclicks.
10.4 Left clicking should not open the context menu. This is mostly the reason behind missclick friend requests, people double clicking slightly off the item icon sending a friend request by mistake. Now I have 4 just because I was trying to make a screenshot. F's in the chat. This would be resolved with 10.2 and 10.3.
10.5 Barter items have a "Barter" icon that is redundant, the first and second column are completely irrelevant to the player.

Example 10.5

11. Filtering search

11.1 "Filter by Item" should not filter the browse list. If you're writing a valid keyword in the search field it should display the correct suggestions. Filtering content is good, filtering suggestions is incoherent.
11.2 Filters could be cleared as soon as you type text in the search field. This would resolve 11.1

Example 11
11.3 "My Offers" could not be affected by filters, or could reset filters. It is more trouble to remove the filter manually every time rather than browsing through the offer list. Currently we never have more than ~10 offers at the same time for most players, which is okay to display without filter.
11.4 Filters should not overlap with other UI elements, they could be resized to fit or the expandable filter list could include more elements so the visible ones fit.

Example 11.4
11.5 The Remember Selected Filter / Reset Filter is unclear. Looks great, feels weird, and should be investigated to be more useful.

12. Context Menu in player lobby


The current lobby with context menu open

All players in this list are looking for a group, there is no need to write a status "Looking for group", it's redundant. The exception is friends, which 99.633...% of the time is the group i'm about to play with. Those are displayed on top.
The only action we do on the list on this screen is the "Invite to group" context menu action. It's a CTA and should not be hidden in a context menu, especially if the context menu only has one option. Since recently it has two, but we'll come to that in a minute.
12.1 The invite CTA should be on the player cell itself.
12.2 The report action should not be the default one from the context menu
12.3 Since there could be only one item in the context menu according to 12.1, the report action could be on the cell as well.

A low quality suggestion for 12.x

13. Trader Buy/Sell

Trader screen needs to be reworked. I won't provide a solution that doesn't completely change how everything looks/works as I stated at the start of the post. That being said this should be improved.


Example 13.1
13.1 Buying UI should be reworked.
When buying, the price of the item is already displayed on the item itself in the trader view.
The price is also displayed a second time in the tooltip of the item if you mouse-over.
The price is also displayed a third time in the barter area on the right of the image (middle of the screen in game). This is redundant. I understand the item on the right is the physical item "Roubles" in a stack that is paid, like a barter, but it does not need to be displayed a third time.
13.2 Quantity limit (red box in the image) could be shown in the tooltip ; most of the time people will hit "DEAL" until they get an error insted of actually reading the red box.
13.3 The red box looks like an error even when at 0/x, this is not intuitive. Limited items can be listed in different ways that are not so invasive. We could add "out of X" at the right side of the quantity box.
13.4 Barter item prices (if we assume 13.1) would need to also displayed differently. This needs to be investigated
13.5 Selling UI should be reworked

Example 13.5

Currently selling an item still displays the full available items to BUY, this is incoherent. Especially from the "Sell" tab. The whole left side of the screen is wasted, and cannot be used.
13.6 Items on the left are not greyed out (even though I can't buy them), but items on the right are greyed out (because I can't sell them). This is incoherent.
13.7 Trader sell space should be infinite
13.8 Buy/Sell could be done in a single tab if the whole screen is reworked. There are different levels to this. An easy one I could think :
"Trade" Tab instead of "Buy". Displays the same as the current "BUY" tab. If you ctrl+click an item from your stash, it instantly sells without confirmation. The second tab would be a "Buyback" where you can see what you sold in the current trade session. If you leave the screen your buyback is reset and items cannot be recovered. Another way would be to keep buybacks for the last X items. You would need to pay what you received to get back. The item would not lose it's FiR status. This preleminary and simplistic rework has issues, notably that you have to know to right click to sell. One way to fix that would be to make right click sell to trader instead of control click, but that would definitely make missclicks the first few days (and buyback would be mandatory).
This could be investigated.
13.9 Currency exchange rates should be easily available in relevant areas (Peacekeeper, Therapist and flea market) for all currencies (Rouble, Euro, Dollar, Bitcoin)

14. Boxing

Items should be boxables and moved around. At least to be dropped in boxes, ideally to be moved around freely.
There is a limit of 20 images. 🤷‍♂
Example 14

15. Quest inventory

If you loot too many quest items in a raid, you can end up not being able to loot it. I assume this is by design and it is why you have limited quest item space.
The quest inventory could be infinite if it's not by design to be limited.
The quest inventory should be manageable. In my case i had a 1 slot item blocking me from taking the suitcase, I should have been allowed to move that 1 slot item to the top or to the right of my inventory, clearing a whole line and letting me take the case.
Quest items could be stored in backpack (and resized) ; since you lose them on death it's not relevant to the players looting you or you dying and that issue would be gone. Storing it in your stash would also prevent you from losing it by going in raid with it by mistake. Taking it in raid or giving it to trader would be a volontary action. It also makes much more sense that way as other quest items (that are also usable items) work that way.


Alright this ended up taking more time than my lunchbreak, and there is *much* more to write but for the time being I'll leave it at that and come tomorrow to add your suggestions or mine. See you in 24 hours.
submitted by SixOneZil to EscapefromTarkov [link] [comments]

Bitcoin की कीमत कितनी है?  Do you know Bitcoin Rate? Bitcoin- DTech World Bitcoin Price Prediction Analysis TODAY  LINK BTC Targets & Market Prediction December 9th LIVE How do you spot trends and predict future prices of a ... Silver Price Forecast for 2020 Could Silver Price Explode like A Bitcoin on Steroids How to Check ♥ BItcoin price ♥ today

Bitcoin’s price plunges again, continuing a rapid drop in December 2017, and leading to yet more speculation of a permanent bubble burst. Prices tanked after January, falling over 50% by April. It’s been speculated that this fall was due to the launch of a Bitcoin futures market. By the end of the year, prices were as low as $3,200. The Kitco Bitcoin price index provides the latest Bitcoin price in US Dollars using an average from the world’s leading exchanges. Follow the Bitcoin price live with the interactive, real-time chart and read our expert articles on the latest BTC news, forecast and technical analysis. Bitcoin (BTC) current price and Bitcoin details. Existing circulation, market capitalization, volume of transactions and more details of Bitcoin. Coins 6.958 +4. Market Cap $402.472.673.937 0.01%. Volume 24h $111.344.500.400-25.38 ... From there, the price of Bitcoin hit a more gradual decline. In mid-July 2014, Bitcoin was priced at about $600, which dropped to just $315 by early 2015. It remained stable over the summer before spiking in November up to $460. By the end of November, it was back to about $360.

[index] [18394] [5561] [46103] [11223] [35114] [29226] [16789] [1080] [25799] [47157]

Bitcoin की कीमत कितनी है? Do you know Bitcoin Rate? Bitcoin- DTech World

My second alexa app, bitcoin. Retreives the current spot price of bitcoin from coindesk. Current Rate Of Bitcoin In INR - Duration: 1:32. Wall-Spot 1,651 views. 1:32. Bitcoin Price Prediction Bitcoin Rate Today Bitcoin India ... How do you spot trends and predict future prices of a CryptoCurrency? PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE THIS VIDEO SO WE CAN DO MORE! Francis Hunt, trader and educator c... Live Bitcoin Liquidation Watch: May 27 2020 IntroToCryptos 177 watching Live now TA 101 - How to Spot Good Entries/Exits - Cryptocurreny Live Stream - Duration: 37:57. Trader and analyst Christopher Jaszczynski seconds his forecast, emphasizing that $20,000 is a realistic price for Bitcoin to reach in the current fundamental setup.

#